Public bug reported:
`/etc/init.d/haproxy status` will return 0 if the pidfile is present,
regardless of whether haproxy is actually running.
I suggest for the check to be rewritten to actually look for a process with
that PID (e.g. `pgrep -F $PIDFILE`).
How to reproduce:
chmod -x /usr/sbin/haproxy
service haproxy restart
Result:
RC of `service haproxy status` is 3, but RC of `/etc/init.d/haproxy status` is 0
Impact:
The initscript is used as a LSB RA for pacemaker deployments; this bug
effectively prevents pacemaker from realizing that haproxy is down (in some
cases).
Tested on:
root@juju-8d5e58-14:~# lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS
Release: 16.04
root@juju-8d5e58-14:~# dpkg -s haproxy | grep Version
Version: 1.6.3-1ubuntu0.1
This bug is present in the most recent debian package upstream as well
(1.9.0-1), but I think it would make sense to track this here first as
we have a lot of OpenStack installations on Xenial that would benefit
from receiving a fix.
** Affects: haproxy (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
High Availability Team, which is subscribed to haproxy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810926
Title:
initscript status check is too fragile
Status in haproxy package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
`/etc/init.d/haproxy status` will return 0 if the pidfile is present,
regardless of whether haproxy is actually running.
I suggest for the check to be rewritten to actually look for a process with
that PID (e.g. `pgrep -F $PIDFILE`).
How to reproduce:
chmod -x /usr/sbin/haproxy
service haproxy restart
Result:
RC of `service haproxy status` is 3, but RC of `/etc/init.d/haproxy status`
is 0
Impact:
The initscript is used as a LSB RA for pacemaker deployments; this bug
effectively prevents pacemaker from realizing that haproxy is down (in some
cases).
Tested on:
root@juju-8d5e58-14:~# lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS
Release: 16.04
root@juju-8d5e58-14:~# dpkg -s haproxy | grep Version
Version: 1.6.3-1ubuntu0.1
This bug is present in the most recent debian package upstream as well
(1.9.0-1), but I think it would make sense to track this here first as
we have a lot of OpenStack installations on Xenial that would benefit
from receiving a fix.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/1810926/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
