Public bug reported:

Currently pacemaker v2 fails to start in armhf containers (and by
extension corosync too).

I found that it is reproducible locally, and that I had to bump a few
limits to get it going.

Specifically I did:

1) bump memlock limits
2) bump rmem_max limits

= 1) Bump memlock limits =

I have no idea, which one of these finally worked, and/or is sufficient.
A bit of a whack-a-mole.

cat >>/etc/security/limits.conf <<EOF
* soft memlock unlimited
* hard memlock unlimited
EOF

lxc config set nice-mako limits.kernel.memlock 33554432

mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/snap.lxd.daemon.service.d/
cat >/etc/systemd/system/snap.lxd.daemon.service.d/override.conf <<EOF
[Service]
LimitMEMLOCK=6553600000
EOF
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart snap.lxd.daemon.service


= 2) Bump rmem_max values =

Observed:
# strace -s99999 -f /usr/sbin/corosync 2>&1 | grep sockop
[pid   447] setsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [8388608], 4) = 0
[pid   447] getsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [425984], [4]) = 0
[pid   447] setsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUFFORCE, [8388608], 4) = -1 EPERM 
(Operation not permitted)

Bumped mem_max using:
sudo sysctl -w net.core.wmem_max=8388608
sudo sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=8388608

(Not sure if the desired sized depends on the machine/container I am
running on)


Can we check the values for above things on our armhf containers and/or bump 
them? or like can we mark pacemaker v2.0 autopkgtest as ignored on armhf?

** Affects: auto-package-testing
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: corosync (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Also affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: corosync (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
High Availability Team, which is subscribed to pacemaker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828228

Title:
  corosync fails to start in container (armhf) bump some limits

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  New
Status in corosync package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pacemaker package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Currently pacemaker v2 fails to start in armhf containers (and by
  extension corosync too).

  I found that it is reproducible locally, and that I had to bump a few
  limits to get it going.

  Specifically I did:

  1) bump memlock limits
  2) bump rmem_max limits

  = 1) Bump memlock limits =

  I have no idea, which one of these finally worked, and/or is
  sufficient. A bit of a whack-a-mole.

  cat >>/etc/security/limits.conf <<EOF
  * soft memlock unlimited
  * hard memlock unlimited
  EOF

  lxc config set nice-mako limits.kernel.memlock 33554432

  mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/snap.lxd.daemon.service.d/
  cat >/etc/systemd/system/snap.lxd.daemon.service.d/override.conf <<EOF
  [Service]
  LimitMEMLOCK=6553600000
  EOF
  systemctl daemon-reload
  systemctl restart snap.lxd.daemon.service

  
  = 2) Bump rmem_max values =

  Observed:
  # strace -s99999 -f /usr/sbin/corosync 2>&1 | grep sockop
  [pid   447] setsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [8388608], 4) = 0
  [pid   447] getsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [425984], [4]) = 0
  [pid   447] setsockopt(12, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUFFORCE, [8388608], 4) = -1 
EPERM (Operation not permitted)

  Bumped mem_max using:
  sudo sysctl -w net.core.wmem_max=8388608
  sudo sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=8388608

  (Not sure if the desired sized depends on the machine/container I am
  running on)

  
  Can we check the values for above things on our armhf containers and/or bump 
them? or like can we mark pacemaker v2.0 autopkgtest as ignored on armhf?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1828228/+subscriptions

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to