--- Ravi Kumar wrote: > but it lacks many > central management > tools and deployement features, mainly GUI based, > which is still to come.
> Very true, I also found this. Linux is powerful and > feature--rich in > command-Line, but when it comes to GUI, it lacks > many thing. Even the GNOME > has not been much mature as WIndws Graphicals and > OSX are. Not even KDE (KDE > is blotted with many options and tools, but it has > been stated as much > developed and advance GUI, uhh, maybe due to QT, and > good team behind it). I > personally like GNOME (dont know why, just matter of > taste). I often come across these comments. People often term these as "absolute" truth, rather than "relative". If you play cricket, and are a right hand batsman, you'll bat the same way. If you choose to bat the other way (left hand batsman) you'll probably feel to do it difficult, initially. You weren't taught to play as a right hand batsman, but you learnt it from observing and the same would be the case with left hand batsman. The point is how you learn. Your brain has vizualized and observed the trend of right hand batting, and not left hand batting. If you observe more left hand batsman, you'll probably know how to bat as a left hand batsman. Mac OS X *_may_* be easier than Windows GUI, and Windows GUI may be easier than KDE / GNOME / <put_your_Desktop_evn_or_window_manager>. My point is about the desktop and GUI. It is not about applications. I don't know whether there are applications to manage the network centrally, development tools etc. But I do know, that there are quite a few tools, that people (including me) might not be aware of. -- FSF of India Associate Fellow - http://www.gnu.org.in S K Somaiya College of ASC - http://www.somaiya.edu/sksasc Send a FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger. Get it now at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/ -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
