But,learning curve(if it is little bit steep),comes for a price.When you are getting the GNU/Linux community editions for FREE ,it is upto the learner,that he/she should try to adapt to the OS and its application as much as possible.Being an end user,I am not desiring or thinking that everybody should be a GEEK onto themselves. Specially,at present the various distros of GNU/Linux particulary UBUNTU and its versions are not at all rocket science to learn and work with.*It(UBUNTU) is one of the easiest and functional GNU/Linux distro. to date. *The same may be applied to openSUSE & MANDRIVA as well. To my opinion,24-hours to try an OS is absolutely ridiculous. Even the so called Windows-OS(COST HIGH at PREMIUM,LICENSING issues,etc.),is not a handful of sweets,within 24-hrs to play with.Various problems may creep up here and there,sometimes the incompatibility between BLOATED Software & Hardware,and likewise...
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Saikiran Madugula <hummerbl...@gmail.com>wrote: > Ramnarayan.K wrote: > > 24 hours with Ubuntu > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/10/24_hours_with_ubuntu.html > > > > A really crappy review of Ubuntu by a BBC reporter, who used it for 24 > > hours and says its not good enough. > > Why do you think its crappy review? He frankly pointed out what worked and > what > did not work *for him* - There is always a learning curve associated with > new > things. But his final point was would he actively seek to install Ubuntu > (translated would I go through the learning curve ?) he says NO because it > does > not actually improve *his* computing experience - that varies from person > to > person and he gave his opinion. > > -- > ubuntu-in mailing list > ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in > -- GOD BLESS US ALL!!!
-- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
