+1 CentOS On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Mehul Ved <mehul.n....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Dhanada Mishra <dhana...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We are trying to configure a high end server for our thin-client lab and our >> consultant advises us to go fr Fedora instead of Ubuntu. The reason is that >> Uuntu server operating system can not take advantage of all of the high end >> capabilities of the hardware. Does any one have any experience in this and >> advise us one way or the other. > > That's definitely not true. The consultant may have said that because > he/she may only be comfortable with Fedora/RHEL. > If I were to personally choose a Linux distro for a server, it would > be primarily between CentOS and Debian. > Ubuntu LTS is also a good choice. > > All said and done, what is more important is the competence of the > System Administrator and his/her familiarity with the underlying OS is > of utmost importance. > if the person is competent with fedora pushing Ubuntu on them may not > be such a good idea. But, you may as well opt for RHEL or CentOS as it > will still be the same as Fedora. > > -- > With Regards, > Mehul Ved > > -- > ubuntu-in mailing list > ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in >
-- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
