Moins,
On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:22:25 +0200 Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephan Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Why not moving away from this LP thingy for merges? > > We could use something like the RT for those "tasks"? > > Do you think about rt.canonical.com? Definitly not... > Or shall we setup another RT > instance? What features do RT offer over malone? AFAIUI you would > need a RT account in addition to your LP account. RT is not a bug tracker, but a ticket/task tracker...so a different tool...therefore it's able to priotize some tasks, e.g. when people are doing merges, where some build-deps are not merged/synced/looked over already. > And most importantely, who is going to maintain that rt instance? Whoever sets it up. Again, I don't advise of doing so in general. But having the QA war going on, and Ubuntu/Canonical QA don't like the idea of having workflow bugs inside LP but we need to have those in some sort of way...I wonder what's the "right" solution here? Really, I wish we could agree on a good solution for everyone, especially to decrease the starting barrier for new contributors... \sh -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
