Sounds fair to me, i will change the name of the option to --build-twice On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 14:20 -0700, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > Nicolas Valcarcel wrote: > > > I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that > > allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need some > > testing, so far i have test it and it's working, but i will prefer to > > have a second (or more) opinions on the feature. The new package can be > > downloaded from my ppa [1], and i will appreciate really much that you > > test it and send me some suggestions/comments. > > I like the idea and I can see its value (even though using it will make > pbuilder even slower...!). > > I wonder if the option name is a little long, and hard to type? For > example, will we really ever see a pbuilder option something like > --build-twice-and-dance-around-the -room-between-the-two-builds ? :-) I > suspect not. The "in-a-row" part is implied, isn't it? So, maybe the > option could be called --build-twice which is still descriptive, but > less typing? > > If there is really a need for a (not-in-a-row) option, to do something > specific between the two builds, perhaps that can be a separate option, > maybe --between-builds="shell-command-to-execute" ? > > Jonathan -- aka nxvl Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
