Soren Hansen wrote: > As much as I dislike upstream tarballs shipping debian directories, I > really don't approve much of the practice of repacking tarballs just for > that reason. > > If I find something that claims to be the original tarball of passenger > 2.0.3 (by having a filename such as passenger_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz), and > the checksum doesn't match what I can find on the upstream's ftp site, I > get *very* suspicious.
In support of not repacking tarballs just because upstream has a debian/ directory, debhelper has include the -i (ignore) feature since major version 6, specifically to allow a packager to create a working package despite what upstream may have added in the debian/ directory. That said, in cases where these sorts of confusions exist, it may be worth documenting it in debian/README.source -- Emmet HIKORY -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu