Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:16:41PM +0000, Peter Cock a écrit : > > Its probably a bad idea to change the package name now, but I would > have called it python-biopython-biosql. Also it isn't tied to Python > 2.2 in any way. My suggestion: > > > python-biopython-sql > > Biopython support for the BioSQL database schema > > This is the Biopython interface to a BioSQL database (see www.biosql.org > > for details). BioPerl, BioJava and BioRuby also provide their own BioSQL > > interfaces onto the same shared SQL schema. > > It would also be nice if all the python-biopython-sql package > webpages/metadata could include www.biosql.org (in addition to > www.biopython.org) on the "External Resources" section.
Dear Peter, I have changed the package description in our Subversion repository according to your suggestion. Our packages pages will be refreshed the next time the package is updated. For the name of the package itself, as you guessed, changing its name is more problematic. The "External Ressources" section of the sidebar of packages.d.o and packages.u.c actually only contains homepages for the moment and I do not know a way to add other links. But I have left a TODO comment for the day it will become possible. By the way, do you think it would be useful to package BioSQL? Thanks a lot for your feedback ! -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
