Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> I'd like to discuss possibly modifying the MOTU SRU process to allow a
> wider group of individuals the ability to approve MOTU SRU requests that are
> simply no change rebuilds. From my experience on the motu-sru team, I've
> made a few observations: ~99.99% of rebuild requests pose minimal levels of
> risk; if a MOTU requests a rebuild he or she is usually involved in
> maintaining the package in question; and frequently the reason the rebuild
> is necessary is because of another SRU or security update (ex.
> xulrunner-1.9).
>
> So in the spirit of making life easier for everyone, I'd like to propose
> allowing all MOTUs the ability to approve SRU requests that are no change
> rebuilds. Optionally, we could also require that the MOTU approving must not
> be the MOTU requesting.
>
> Thoughts, Feedback?
How often is this actually the case that is required to change the
process? I would have thought that SRUs in general would not general
rebuilds (I'm ignoring clamav, because it's thpecial).
Cheers,
--
Steve
<bob2> joy hasn't spoken on IRC in 45 seconds, he must be MIA!
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
