Do not turn this into a debate about the merits of qmail, that is off-topic. You can see the debian report on inclusion here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510415 sharms On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Caroline Ford <caroline.ford.w...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Is it unmaintained upstream? We don't want a mail client full of > security holes and bugs. It's not just a "package and go" process. > > Caroline > Sent from a mobile device. > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 14:24, Jiri Navratil <j...@navratil.cz> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm considering to create qmail package for debian and ubuntu usage. >> >> I'm using 12 years qmail (compiling from source code) As the owner >> changed the licence, now the package can be created. >> >> Could you let me know, if my work can be taken? What I shall read to >> understand, how hard is to make package, which roles shall be >> followed? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Best regards, >> Jiri >> >> -- >> Jiri Navratil, http://www.navratil.cz, +420 777 224 245 >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-motu mailing list >> Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu > > -- > Ubuntu-motu mailing list > Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu > -- GPG Key ID: C92EF367 / 1428 FE8E 1E07 DDA8 EFD7 195F DCCD F5B3 C92E F367 WWW: http://www.sharms.org/blog -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu