Hi Mark, Am Monday 02 November 2009 11:00:57 schrieb Mark Shuttleworth: > Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > Am Saturday 31 October 2009 10:57:21 schrieb Martin Pitt: > >> Stefan Potyra [2009-10-31 2:58 +0100]: > >>> That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership > >>> of otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail) > >>> prolonged by the will of one developer. > >> > >> Well, it wasn't just that. It was discussed on th DMB list, and there > >> was general agreement (Mark voted +1 on the list, Colin on IRC, I > >> agreed as well, and there was no objection from other members). > > > > thanks for clearing that up, but I must admit that I'm now even more > > confused: Daniel wrote that this was a decision of TB and CC, while you > > wrote that it was done on the (private) DMB list, making me assume that > > it was an action of DMB. Which board did take the decision then? > > Oh for Pete's sake! > > This was a simple pragmatic decision to preserve the status quo while we > move to a cleaner, better structure. > > Let's not bog ourselves down in procedural pedantry. If the CC need to, > we can make direct appointments and replacements on any structure in > Ubuntu, and will do so.
Thanks, Mark, that's at least a clear announcement, helping me better
understand how the Ubuntu government works in reality, and to what degree
government bodies value the community.
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
