Still waiting on a +1 from Daviey

Thanks,

Thomas Mashos



On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Thomas Mashos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mario,
>
> I know that mythbuntu-dev won't remove the red tape. It is a little
> frustrating though that once my software makes it into the archive, I can no
> longer write code and commit directly to the branch (since it is then owned
> by mythbuntu-dev)
>
> I'll continue to get my packages into the archive. I was just a little
> frustrated when I was doing that.
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I agree, it's easy to get discouraged when trying to get new software into
>> the Ubuntu repositories because of how much human subjectivity is involved
>> as it's reviewed before accepting into the archive.  Please keep in mind
>> becoming a developer with upload rights doesn't suddenly remove that red
>> tape.  Code review is a healthy procedure that I think should continue to
>> exists.  I think it would be good for you to help identify where some of
>> those deficiencies that you encountered with the process for new packages
>> were and specifically why the automated tools (revu, lintian, etc) weren't
>> able to triage them ahead of time.  The more that the automated tools grow,
>> the less human subjectivity can play into review.
>>
>> PPAs are a useful tool, but not having red tape and peer review is a
>> double edged sword.  Uploading to a PPA that people use on their stable
>> boxes has a lot more potential to break dozens of boxes.  We've had these
>> types of problems with the auto-builds mythtv branches in the past with
>> botched patches, and need to keep it to a minimum.  This is exactly why the
>> Ubuntu SRU process exists.  So I would like you to continue with any new
>> software in the Ubuntu archive even if it ends up being troublesome to
>> initially get accepted.
>>
>> I think that overall you've shown a lot of growth from the first Mythbuntu
>> packages that you worked on to the most recent that i've reviewed
>> (mythbuntu-bare) and seem to have a good concept of how package maintenance
>> works with stuff actually in the Ubuntu archive during the development
>> phases.  You take feature freeze seriously and attempt to get all of your
>> work done in time for the freeze.
>>
>> Right now I don't think any of the stuff specific to the Mythbuntu package
>> set fits with Debian because it's all so tightly wrapped around MythTV which
>> isn't yet in Debian.  There is however an ongoing effort for MythTV
>> inclusion in Debian.  When that happens, I would like to see you explore
>> moving the packages that you've written and maintain in Ubuntu into Debian
>> as well.
>>
>> So as long as you can continue to work directly in the archive even for
>> NEW packages, I think mythbuntu-dev is a good fit for you.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 13:38, Thomas Mashos <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Name: Thomas Mashos
>>> Launchpad page: https://launchpad.net/~tgm4883
>>>
>>> Who I am: A Mythbuntu developer that apparently doesn't have access to
>>> his own software.
>>>
>>> My Ubuntu Story: I got into Mythbuntu when it was being founded, which
>>> was April 2007. At that point I didn't know much about creating software,
>>> but was willing to help document things and triage bugs. Through the support
>>> of Mario Limonciello and Daviey Walker, I am now able to contribute in more
>>> of a development role.
>>>
>>> Areas of work: I'm the creator or mythbuntu-bare, mythbuntu-repos, and
>>> mythbuntu-log-grabber. I've written documentation, triaged bugs, submitted
>>> patches, reproduced issues, and assisted in distributing Mythbuntu.
>>>
>>> Things I could do better: I could submit software for inclusion into
>>> Debian, rather that deal with attempting to get my software that was written
>>> specifically for Mythbuntu into the Ubuntu archives.
>>>
>>> Plans for the future: To continue to patch my software that is already in
>>> the archive and use PPA's for everything else.
>>>
>>> Examples of my work: See Mythbuntu-bare, mythbuntu-repos,
>>> mythbuntu-log-grabber.
>>>
>>> What I like least in Ubuntu: The red tape required to get things into the
>>> repositories. How there always seems to be one more hoop to jump through. An
>>> attempt in making it easier for the Mythbuntu team to patch software that we
>>> are responsible for has left me without the ability to commit anything to my
>>> Mythbuntu bzr branches.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mario Limonciello
>> [email protected]
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mashos

-- 
Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv

Reply via email to