The decision to make the guide focus on UDD (as in Daniel's comment) makes sense from the view that it should focus on one workflow instead of trying to cover all workflows, UDD is available today and can be accepted by all teams even if it's not their main workflow. However it does need to be honest that UDD isn't used directly by most teams yet and it has problems which can make it slow and fiddly to work with. It should include or point to information on traditional packaging methods. If not the title then a subtitle should be clear what it's focus is.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Packaging Guide Team, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Packaging Guide. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792381 Title: Not really an "Ubuntu Packaging Guide" Status in Ubuntu Packaging Guide: New Bug description: This guide only covers UDD, not the tools and processes that (I believe) most Ubuntu developers use. It should either reflect the mature and reliable toolset that is normallly used or be renamed to make it clear this is not a general packaging guide. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-packaging-guide/+bug/792381/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
