- Why do you remove the section about libvigraimpex? - the section following "Then determine the source package corresponding to this binary package::" seems to have been correct before.
apt-cache show <package> gives different results if the binary package has the same or a different name than the source package. So I replaced it with apt-cache showsrc <package> which acts the same in both cases, so the libvigraimpex case is no longer needed. - bzr commit instead of debcommit? (debcommit does much more than just 'bzr commit') >From bzr 2.4 and bzr-builddeb 2.7.5 bzr commit now magically takes the commit >message from debian/changelog too, the feeling among UDD developers is it's >better to use bzr commands to keep things consistent. - Do you think it makes sense to have two copies of the knowledge base article index? No, I'll remove that - Why do you leave the link to intrepid and remove the link to natty? (line 419) Intrepid is used in the doc as an example of a past release. I removed references to Natty as an example of a current development release because it's confusing since it not a current development release. I don't think the links to release wiki pages are very important either way. - Is "bzr tag" necessary nowadays? Yes it tags with the current release version. bzr mark-uploaded is now no longer needed. - Why do you remove the "update-maintainer" bits? As agreed with barry this isn't a good place to include it, I'll file a bug to add it back elsewhere such as the debian/ directory introduction page. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~jr/ubuntu-packaging-guide/fixes/+merge/67951 Your team Ubuntu Packaging Guide Team is subscribed to branch lp:ubuntu-packaging-guide. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
