On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:39:57AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Feb 01, 2012, at 03:35 PM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > >"bzr dep3-patch" can often be a good alternative to "bzr diff -p ..." because > >it will also generate the relevant DEP3 headers (including whether or not the > >changes are upstream, the authors, etc). It doesn't work with uncommitted > >changes in the current tree yet, perhaps we should add that. > Thanks, I didn't know about that command. Do you think it would make things > clearer to mention it? Or, would it be possible to tweak the diff prefix > default when in a source branch? For the moment, I think just "bzr diff -p" is more sensible. Once dep3-patch works well enough we could mention that, or integrate it into "bzr diff" (e.g. "bzr diff --format=dep3").
We could automatically enable -p in source package branches, but it might be confusing for users if that default changed from branch to branch, and it's unclear why the default is different. What do you think ? Cheers, Jelmer -- https://code.launchpad.net/~barry/ubuntu-packaging-guide/udd-update/+merge/90976 Your team Ubuntu Packaging Guide Team is subscribed to branch lp:ubuntu-packaging-guide. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
