Indeed, I found it odd that GNU Hello was not used, as it's what I have seen in other introductions to packaging. Perhaps consistency and tradition would provide the simplest solution.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Packaging Guide Team, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Packaging Guide. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913934 Title: [Packaging New Software] Example does not build Status in Ubuntu Packaging Guide: Triaged Bug description: Regarding the walk-through at http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/packaging-new- software.html; For kqrcode 0.4, the archive appears to have file corruption. Going with version 0.6 instead, the user will be presented with an error that "qrcodec.h" is missing. It must be extracted from the following archive and placed in the kqrcode source dir. http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com/sourceforge/k/project/kq/kqrcode/KQRCode-dev/kqrcode-dev-0.6.0.tar.gz This is technically a kqrcode bug, but all of this info should probably be noted here as well. On a side note, kqrcode appears to be a moribund project. Perhaps a better-maintained example package could be substituted in later revisions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-packaging-guide/+bug/913934/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
