Public bug reported: I was reading http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-ftbfs.html when I noticed the following:
"Ubuntu has added arm64 as a architecture recently, but many packages fail to build on it. A full list of the packages not building are at qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/arm64.html." First of all I noticed that the url wasn't a link, but after browsing to it I found a list of build failures for 14.04. Now that armhf and arm64 are listed on the main FTBFS page (http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/), I wonder whether this paragraph is still necessary or whether it could be removed. Version: 0.3.7~bzr578~ubuntu14.04.1. ** Affects: ubuntu-packaging-guide Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Packaging Guide Team, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Packaging Guide. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1485311 Title: Fixing FTBFS - is separate section on arm64 still necessary? Status in Ubuntu Packaging Guide: New Bug description: I was reading http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-ftbfs.html when I noticed the following: "Ubuntu has added arm64 as a architecture recently, but many packages fail to build on it. A full list of the packages not building are at qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/arm64.html." First of all I noticed that the url wasn't a link, but after browsing to it I found a list of build failures for 14.04. Now that armhf and arm64 are listed on the main FTBFS page (http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/), I wonder whether this paragraph is still necessary or whether it could be removed. Version: 0.3.7~bzr578~ubuntu14.04.1. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-packaging-guide/+bug/1485311/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
