On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:10:02AM -0500, Pat McGowan wrote: > Note that the developer should be able to claim support for multiple > frameworks. > > We had decided to revision frameworks separately for Qt/QML and HTML, so > should we go ahead with that now rather than use a "sdk" named revision?
Jamie's item 7 is a prerequisite for that, and it'll take a little while (weeks, not months). We need to move on with this, so I think we should probably go ahead with the monolithic sdk framework to unblock people, and consider subdividing later. (decoupling for the win) -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
