On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Oct 11, 2014, at 03:48 PM, Vojtech Bocek wrote: > >>I've just removed the broken image (version 82) from my >>s-i.tasemnice.eu server (the one for hammerhead and deb). The same >>thing applies - if you've already downloaded it, don't install it. It >>_should_ be safe to update to version 81 though. > > I wonder if it makes sense to be able to "blacklist" images more easily. > Rather than having to tear down the whole server, we could instead possibly > publish a list of blacklisted images which the system-image client would then > ignore for upgrade path calculations. > > I'm not sure whether that would be best described in the index.json, > channels.json or some other file.
yes, a few things were really not great here and we have to look at those in a systematic post-mortem one by one - just not during weekend. > > -Barry > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp