Hi Brendan, I think we could use the same doc, as discussed on the channel, maybe on a separate tab?
Thanks, Gema On 21/12/11 11:38, Brendan Donegan wrote: > Hi Gema, > > I should probably remember this, but should we use the Google Doc for > new test cases (I've got some proper test cases for gnome-terminal in my > head)? > > Thanks, > > On 21/12/11 11:32, Gema Gomez wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have been doing some browsing of test cases in our wiki and found >> these ones: >> http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Applications/Terminal >> >> I was trying to figure out how to classify the test cases when we get >> them into Case Conductor and realized, that in this case in particular, >> the test cases are wrongly classified. >> >> Take for instance, ter-001 test case, it says it affects gnome-terminal, >> and whilst I can see we are opening and closing the terminal, my >> impression is that test case is targeting sudo, apt-get, ls and bash, >> rather than the gnome-terminal. >> >> I think we need to start removing this kind of test case and adding >> tests that actually target the packages we are trying to test, so that >> if we decide to classify test cases based on the package they are >> testing, we have a clear view of those. Another alternative is to add >> all the affected packages to the list, not just the main one. I >> understand this was difficult with the current wiki, but in Case >> Conductor we will have more flexibility to assign test cases to more >> than one package. >> >> I hope you all have a nice holiday! >> Gema >> >> > > -- Gema Gomez-Solano <gema.gomez-sol...@canonical.com> Ubuntu QA Team https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez Canonical Ltd. http://www.canonical.com -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
