On 11/01/2012 17:49, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Alex, I started working through your version of the wiki also today. I > pulled some of the changes you had made and replaced/edited the relevant > sections on the main page. It would be good to get your content merged > asap, so it doesn't fall out of date. We have the ability to revert > changes, so I would encourage you to make your changes directly onto the > main site and we can tweak as we get more feedback. Thoughts?
+1 It is quite confusing to have to send people to a temporary copy, having the new content on the main wiki would help loads keep improving. Plus, we have a very comprehensive new version already. > > Nicholas >> Hi Alex, >> thanks a lot for this change! My feedback follows. >> >> *Structure of the page* >> >> I think the wiki should have a clearer structure, so we should think >> about how to reorganize the text in a way that tells our story and >> sounds appealing to the reader. So I propose: >> >> == Welcome == >> <introduction goes here, let's say what you have already before "What >> kinds of things does Ubuntu QA do?"> >> >> == What we do == >> <you have the list on the wiki, in my opinion it needs a bit of >> reworking> >> >> == Getting involved == >> <here we explain how to get involved in the work we are doing so things >> like a link to the qa-ubuntu list, qa launchpad group are good there, >> plus a link to our weekly meeting> >> >> == Currect Activities == >> <Sounds good> >> >> == Contact Us == >> <Sounds good too> >> >> >> *Content of the page* >> >> - I think this statement needs rewriting: >> "The Ubuntu QA team is focused on developing tools, policies, and >> practices for ensuring Ubuntu's quality as a distribution as well as >> providing general advice, oversight, and leadership of QA activities >> within the Ubuntu project." >> >> AFAIK, we do not develop tools, we mainly use them. But we write and >> develop test cases :D >> >> - The areas in which QA is divided do not make much sense either, at >> least from my perspective, maybe it was like that in the past? Need some >> time to think about this one. >> >> - What is the difference between the "Testing Team" and the "QA Team"? >> We seem to have two different pages and I am not sure they are trying to >> convey different messages. The paragraph starting with "We cannot leave >> quality to good luck" is repeated in both. >> >> I love the design and the icons at the top, very stylish :D >> >> Cheers, >> Gema >> >> On 13/12/11 21:00, Alex Lourie wrote: >> >/ Hi all >> />/ >> />/ I've started working on our wiki [1] page update [2]. So far I've >> />/ cleared the obvious >> />/ parts (about Bug Squad for example), updated the content and >> changed the >> />/ order of things >> />/ to better cater to the potential reader. >> />/ >> />/ Please review and provide feedback :-) >> />/ >> />/ Thanks a lot. >> />/ >> />/ [1]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam >> />/ [2]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlexLourie/QAWikiNew >> />/ >> />/ -- />/ Alex Lourie >> />/ >> />/ >> / >> >> -- >> Gema Gomez-Solano<gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com >> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa>> >> Ubuntu QA Teamhttps://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez >> <https://launchpad.net/%7Egema.gomez> >> Canonical Ltd.http://www.canonical.com >> >> > > > > > -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
