I would say that then the word ubuntu-quality is a bit too broad than its actual purpose, i should have researched more but i did think they were not limited to ISO testing only. As you stated that's not the case then its a bit of misunderstanding about #ubuntu-quality on my end.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Thomas Ward <tew...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Micah Gersten <mic...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > On 01/03/2013 07:14 AM, Omer Akram wrote: > >> Hi All > >> > >> Just recently there started a discussion on Ubuntu bug squad list > >> about less people getting involved in bug triage along the discussion > >> there were a few points raised which let me to put the idea of merging > >> #ubuntu-quality and #ubuntu-bugs into one. Ultimately both have the > >> same goal that is talking about quality in Ubuntu. > >> > >> At time people testing Ubuntu ISO will raise their bugs in > >> #ubuntu-quality and discussions may take place there. People may or > >> may not be available in both channels but since I believe people do > >> talk mostly about bug reports in those channels (though > >> #ubuntu-quality do have other topics as well) but I think merging them > >> will make a few things easier one will be that there will be mostly a > >> unified place for people to talk about bugs (i know people may talk in > >> #ubuntu+1 or #ubuntu-desktop as well but those channels have their own > >> reasons for exisitance) > >> > >> Here I might not have a lot of point to argue plus I am never great > >> with words but the overall notion is that I believe that it will > >> result in a benefit for Ubuntu due to having a concentrated place to > >> talk bugs. > >> > >> Thoughts/Suggestions/Pros/Cons all welcome and appreciated > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > > I'm not sure I agree with this. #ubuntu-bugs is specifically for bug > > triage, whereas #ubuntu-quality seems to not have a defined topic. > > Whereas I'm likely to watch #ubuntu-bugs for people who need help with > > triage, I'm not necessarily interested in most of what happens with > > image testing and the issues that arise from it. This is not to say > > that I don't care, rather that I'm not necessarily going to commit my > > time to such issues. > > You could in theory condense #ubuntu-devel, -desktop, and -release into > > quality as well as the goal is quality, but I don't see that as being > > productive. > > Thanks, > > Micah > > > > -- > > Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list > > ubuntu-bugsq...@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad > > I am in full agreement with Micah, what #ubuntu-quality does is ISO > testing and other ISO/image related testing, and not necessarily bug > triage. I lurk in both #ubuntu-bugs and #ubuntu-quality. The > channels have separate goals. And in #ubuntu-bugs, I'm also more than > happy to help out with bug triaging, but I don't want to see ISO > testing bugs and related stuff in #ubuntu-bugs either. > > Since not everyone's responding to both the BugSquad and > ubuntu-quality lists, I've sent this response to both. > > ------ > Thomas > Ubuntu BugSquad Member > > -- > Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list > ubuntu-bugsq...@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad >
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality