Thomas Ward:
> What of the individuals doing the upstreaming, are they linking the
> bugs correctly?
Alberto Salvia Novella:
> Please:
> 1. Report to [UPSTREAM BUG TRACKER URL].
> 2. Paste the new report URL here.
> 3. Set this bug status back to "confirmed".
> Thank you.
👬 The reporter isn't who links the bug upstream, but a triager.
Thomas Ward:
> Have you actually validated the value *upstream* from Ubuntu on this?
📺 As this dumps all the comments from upstream to Launchpad, all what's
going on will be visible downstream too, won't it? So any mismatch
should be obvious.
Brendan Perrine:
> How many of the bugs get fixed is the important metric and how
> quickly they get fixed.
📩 For making it fast, original triagers can just subscribe to
notifications and link upstream as soon as the bug gets confirmed back.
📊 And if you make the mean of days it took to triaged bugs in
<https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=asked-to-upstream> to get
triaged till the user was asked to upstream, it has been 10 days. Been
the most frequently case the very same day, making the 50% of samples.
📉 Looking at
<https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=asked-to-upstream&orderby=-heat&start=0>
you can realize that the most grave and frequent bugs tend to be triaged
months in advance of release.
<http://www.magic-stickers.com/images/produits/reelles/Sticker_autocolante_caffe_coffee_what_else_92037_G.jpg>
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
