On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: > > CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue
> > Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that > > provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide > > libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There > > are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav, > > boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each). > > Attached are a list of rdepends affected. > ...ouch. > Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe > this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to > revert it for now, and then after A3's out, assess if if makes sense > to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this > one. > Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon > us, it seems a bit risky to add this in, esp. with folks going on > vacation right now. > What do others think? I agree, best to back this out. Micah, will you upload the necessary change? (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while libjpeg8-dev is the default?) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
