On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:17:40PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: > > I'm personally fine with either 800MB or 750MiB (786MB) as a target for this > > cycle, I just want to make sure we understand our trajectory for future > > releases and that the limit in quantal makes sense as a point on that > > trajectory.
> I'd rather see us go to 800MB and give us some breathing room to > experiment with this new form factor, now that we've made the decision > to not use CDs. One of the reasons for wanting to only grow the image gradually is that software *will* expand to use all available space, and by only giving ourselves a little bit at a time, we can make sure we're continuing to be disciplined about the growth. I don't think the difference between 786 and 800 is a big deal either way... but I also don't think "breathing room" should be the deciding factor :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
