On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:35:54AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Steve Langasek > <steve.langa...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > Fair enough, It's just that so far none of the flavors have responded, so > > I'm not sure if they considered this addressed at them. > > > > Which flavors need to sign off on this? Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Ubuntu Studio, > > UbuntuKylin?
> Representatives from everyone (that didn't already pull in Noto Color > Emoji) except Kylin have replied to the bug directly. Ah, excellent. > Kubuntu and Lubuntu Next object to having Noto Color Emoji installed by > default. > The Lubuntu and Lubuntu Next metapackages ignore Recommends so I don't > think Lubuntu's opinion should carry much weight here. (They already > don't install Symbola and won't be getting this new Recommends now > anyway). > Qt doesn't support color emoji everywhere yet. So I suggest that > Kubuntu could just have some thing like libqt5gui5 pull in Symbola for > now instead of having it done by desktop-common. If that's fine, then > we're ok to drop Symbola from desktop-common. > The remaining question is whether it's appropriate for desktop-common > to pull in the default Noto Color Emoji font that is useful for most > GTK (and Cairo I think) apps or if most desktop metapackages will need > to explicitly request it instead. If Kubuntu and Lubuntu Next are objecting to its inclusion by default, then I think this is clear-cut. The desktop-common seed is meant to be packages that are actually common, and if there's not consensus among flavors that a given package should be, then it shouldn't be. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
