I think the point is that if we are updating the vendored dependencies like in your diff then we can provide a link to the changelog or release notes for those dependencies
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 19:46, Utkarsh Gupta <utkarsh.gu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 8:37 PM Lukasz Zemczak > <lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote: > > I think it would be good if we required outlining the vendored package > > version changes in the SRU template, at least for documentation > > purposes. At least listing the changes of those vendor packages - > > maybe even a link to the changelogs, if possible. The latter might or > > might-not be difficult, so I wouldn't consider it a hard requirement > > though. > > It's not that it changes a lot but whenever there is a change, it's > slightly big. For instance, the update I am working on right now has a > massive set of changes. See the git diff (--name-only) attached. I can > try to link the changelog but when a lot of dependencies change, it > just gets a bit cumbersome - which is why we've vendored them in the > first place. ;) > > > - u > _______________________________________________ > Cpc-gcp mailing list -- cpc-...@lists.canonical.com > To unsubscribe send an email to cpc-gcp-le...@lists.canonical.com > -- Phil Roche Staff Software Engineer Canonical Public Cloud
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
