Hi. I don't see how resolvconf could be responsible for this problem. Initial observation: it seems that dig gets the correct answer from dnsmasq when it supplies the additional option udp:1280, but the glibc resolver doesn't get the right answer from dnsmasq when it fails to supply that option. Reassigning to dnsmasq.
** Package changed: resolvconf (Ubuntu) => dnsmasq (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466608 Title: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1466608/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
