> The images should do what is necessary to support both UEC and EC2 very > well, until such time as we find that it would be more effective to maintain > two separate images.
I read that to indicate that we should have installed in the image linux-image-virtual and linux-image-ec2 (or whatever that ends up being called). According to [1] the installed size of the -virtual kernel (which we'd probably install for UEC) to be < 8MB, and [2] shows the -ec2 flavor to be ~ 18M. When bug 428692 is fixed, I'd expect a smaller amount of modules in the latter, resulting in a smaller installed size. So, we're looking at less than 26M installed into a 10GB filesystem. So, I agree, that is probably a reasonable use of space. -- [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/linux-image-2.6.31-10-virtual [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~timg-tpi/+archive/ppa/+build/1235076 -- ec2: Include kernel modules in AMIs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
