On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:28:00AM -0000, Clint Byrum wrote: > I like that idea quite a bit for natty and later, thats probably the > right way to go, especially since we'll also be getting "override" files > at some point. I'll submit it to upstart as a feature request.
Ok. > I doubt we'll backport manual to maverick and lucid's upstart, so we're > still left with the problem of updating peoples' systems and potentially > starting services that are meant to stay stopped. Right; I'm not going to try to fix that issue in lucid/maverick. It's unfortunate, but that's a significant semantic change that I don't think is backportable. BTW, a prerequisite to backporting this debhelper change is to fix bug #707971 in upstart-job, which is causing much havoc for people right now in natty. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690640 Title: dh_installinit upstart support start a job in postinst script regardless of previous status -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
