I've been unable to reproduce this, but there are a ton of duplicates so
there is no doubt that there is something wrong with the lucid updates.

I actually think this is directly related to bug #736348 . By calling
'restart' directly, we are not re-loading the new job file. So until the
system is rebooted, squid will still be run with 'expect fork' and
without -N. I am suspicious that this is just exposing *more* issues
with the way that squid forks, since the bug we were originally trying
to fix involves how squid handles SIGHUP, its conceivable that it
handles SIGTERM in a way that is incompatible w/ upstart's expect fork
as well.

I'm not ready to mark this as a duplicate of that bug, but I think it
may be. I'm hoping somebody can provide us with some more information
regarding the state of their system *before* the upgrade, that may
suggest what state causes the restart to fail. In the mean time, it
makes sense to get that fix into natty for testing, especially as people
start to try natty out as it approaches beta.

It also seems at least one person has hit upstart bug #406397 , which
also suggests further that this is caused by mixing expect fork with
daemons that don't fork in the way upstart suggests. Unfortunately that
is a particularly nasty bug whose only workaround is to make a program
that forks until the pid that has gone missing can be recreated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729288

Title:
  squid failed to restart after update to squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Reply via email to