Launchpad has imported 10 comments from the remote bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329571.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-07-23T12:44:04+00:00 Rose-g wrote: We have a rather slow inhouse timeserver: root@cheetah:/home/rose(53)# ping 10.101.10.20 PING 10.101.10.20 (10.101.10.20) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=6.88 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=127 time=1.22 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=127 time=2.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=127 time=0.538 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=127 time=87.9 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=6 ttl=127 time=6.77 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=7 ttl=127 time=7.13 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=8 ttl=127 time=1.24 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=9 ttl=127 time=0.354 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=10 ttl=127 time=79.5 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=11 ttl=127 time=0.416 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=12 ttl=127 time=0.427 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_seq=13 ttl=127 time=1.90 ms ^C --- 10.101.10.20 ping statistics --- 13 packets transmitted, 13 received, 0% packet loss, time 12011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.354/15.118/87.950/29.409 ms Setting the system time with net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p2 fails with: root@cheetah:/home/rose(33)# ntpdate -v -d -d -b -u 10.101.10.20 23 Jul 12:54:11 ntpdate[813]: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o Mon Jul 19 02:43:33 UTC 2010 (1) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) 10.101.10.20: Server dropped: no data server 10.101.10.20, port 123 stratum 5, precision -17, leap 00, trust 000 refid [10.101.10.20], delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 transmitted 4, in filter 4 reference time: cff3f35a.029c6b63 Fri, Jul 23 2010 12:54:18.010 originate timestamp: cff3f35a.029c6b63 Fri, Jul 23 2010 12:54:18.010 transmit timestamp: cff3f35a.02f5a519 Fri, Jul 23 2010 12:54:18.011 filter delay: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 filter offset: 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 offset 0.000000 23 Jul 12:54:19 ntpdate[7112]: no server suitable for synchronization found If I downgrade to net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p1-r1 I can set the system time: root@cheetah:/home/rose(35)# emerge -v1 =net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p1-r1 ... >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. * IMPORTANT: 13 config files in '/etc' need updating. * See the CONFIGURATION FILES section of the emerge * man page to learn how to update config files. root@cheetah:/home/rose(36)# ntpdate -v -d -d -b -u 10.101.10.20 23 Jul 13:06:26 ntpdate[17815]: ntpdate 4.2.6p1@1.2158-o Fri Jul 23 10:59:23 UTC 2010 (1) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) server 10.101.10.20, port 123 stratum 5, precision -17, leap 00, trust 000 refid [10.101.10.20], delay 0.02599, dispersion 0.00063 transmitted 4, in filter 4 reference time: cff3f632.3c2ab5bc Fri, Jul 23 2010 13:06:26.235 originate timestamp: cff3f632.3c2ab5bc Fri, Jul 23 2010 13:06:26.235 transmit timestamp: cff3f632.40929678 Fri, Jul 23 2010 13:06:26.252 filter delay: 0.02840 0.03220 0.02599 0.02600 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 filter offset: -0.01843 -0.02038 -0.01740 -0.01740 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 delay 0.02599, dispersion 0.00063 offset -0.017409 23 Jul 13:06:26 ntpdate[17815]: step time server 10.101.10.20 offset -0.017409 sec If I now upgrade again ntp, setting system time fails again: root@cheetah:/home/rose(38)# emerge -vuDN world ... root@cheetah:/home/rose(38)# dispatch-conf ... root@cheetah:/home/rose(52)# ntpdate -v -d -d -b -u 10.101.10.20 23 Jul 13:33:03 ntpdate[6092]: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o Fri Jul 23 11:27:06 UTC 2010 (1) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) 10.101.10.20: Server dropped: no data server 10.101.10.20, port 123 stratum 5, precision -17, leap 00, trust 000 refid [10.101.10.20], delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 transmitted 4, in filter 4 reference time: cff3fc75.be9b403b Fri, Jul 23 2010 13:33:09.744 originate timestamp: cff3fc75.be9b403b Fri, Jul 23 2010 13:33:09.744 transmit timestamp: cff3fc75.c877304d Fri, Jul 23 2010 13:33:09.783 filter delay: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 filter offset: 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 offset 0.000000 23 Jul 13:33:11 ntpdate[6092]: no server suitable for synchronization found PS. Setting of system time with net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p2 fails on three PCs. With an other PC outside our institute (not restricted by a firewall) I have no problems to set the system time with net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p2 and using 0.gentoo.pool.ntp.org as timeserver. Reproducible: Always Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-07-28T18:49:15+00:00 Rose-g wrote: I have the same issue with net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p2-r1. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-25T05:35:17+00:00 S-paul-n wrote: I noticed a few days ago that this version's daemon fails to keep my home (behind a broadband router) computer's time correct, and because it doesn't bother saying anything at all about what it's doing in syslog anymore, I had no idea where the problem might lie. Since the ntp documentation is also appallingly opaque, I just downgraded again. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-09T19:13:49+00:00 Rose-g wrote: More than two month later I still have this problem. The connection to the timeserver seems to be faster: root@cheetah:/root(34)# ping 10.101.10.20 PING 10.101.10.20 (10.101.10.20) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=127 time=0.286 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=127 time=0.315 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=127 time=0.298 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=127 time=0.197 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=127 time=0.354 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=127 time=0.395 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=127 time=0.516 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=127 time=0.388 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=9 ttl=127 time=0.496 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=10 ttl=127 time=0.535 ms 64 bytes from 10.101.10.20: icmp_req=11 ttl=127 time=0.221 ms ^C --- 10.101.10.20 ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 9997ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.197/0.363/0.535/0.112 ms But ntpdate still says "Server dropped: no data": root@cheetah:/root(35)# ntpdate -o 2 -t 5.0 -p 8 -d -d 10.101.10.20 9 Nov 21:31:30 ntpdate[3227]: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o Wed Jul 28 02:36:37 UTC 2010 (1) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) transmit to 10.101.10.20 receive(10.101.10.20) transmit(10.101.10.20) 10.101.10.20: Server dropped: no data server 10.101.10.20, port 123 stratum 5, precision -17, leap 00, trust 000 refid [10.101.10.20], delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 transmitted 8, in filter 8 reference time: d084190a.bc06b19f Tue, Nov 9 2010 20:01:30.734 originate timestamp: d084190a.bc06b19f Tue, Nov 9 2010 20:01:30.734 transmit timestamp: d0842e30.a4d34fbb Tue, Nov 9 2010 21:31:44.643 filter delay: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 filter offset: 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 delay 0.00000, dispersion 64.00000 offset 0.000000 9 Nov 21:31:46 ntpdate[3227]: no server suitable for synchronization found Nmap identifies the timeserver as: IP ID Sequence Generation: Busy server or unknown class Service Info: Host: *.*.*.*; OSs: NetWare, Unix Any idea besides downgrading of ntp to solve the problem? There is a similar bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599793 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-10T15:32:42+00:00 Rose-g wrote: I posted this bug upstream, compare URL, and got the answer that ntpdate is deprecated. Perhaps gentoo should modify /etc/init.d/ntp-client. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-10T21:39:22+00:00 MikeFrysinger wrote: ntpdate has been "deprecated" for almost a decade at this point. see Bug 21527. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-11T10:20:29+00:00 Rose-g wrote: If I run 'ntpd -g -q -x -d' instead of 'ntpdate -v -d -d -b -u 10.101.10.20', I see: root@moose:/tmp/tiff_test(76)# ntpd -g -q -x -d ntpd 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o Thu Nov 11 09:53:35 UTC 2010 (1) addto_syslog: proto: precision = 0.102 usec event at 0 0.0.0.0 c01d 0d kern kernel time sync enabled Finished Parsing!! addto_syslog: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16 addto_syslog: Listen and drop on 0 v4wildcard 0.0.0.0 UDP 123 addto_syslog: Listen and drop on 1 v6wildcard :: UDP 123 addto_syslog: Listen normally on 2 lo 127.0.0.1 UDP 123 restrict: op 1 addr 127.0.0.1 mask 255.255.255.255 mflags 00003000 flags 00000001 addto_syslog: Listen normally on 3 br0 192.168.2.20 UDP 123 restrict: op 1 addr 192.168.2.20 mask 255.255.255.255 mflags 00003000 flags 00000001 addto_syslog: Listen normally on 4 virbr0 192.168.100.1 UDP 123 restrict: op 1 addr 192.168.100.1 mask 255.255.255.255 mflags 00003000 flags 00000001 addto_syslog: Listen normally on 5 br0 fe80::21f:d0ff:fea1:b79c UDP 123 restrict: op 1 addr fe80::21f:d0ff:fea1:b79c mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff mflags 00003000 flags 00000001 addto_syslog: Listen normally on 6 eth0 fe80::21f:d0ff:fea1:b79c UDP 123 restrict: op 1 addr fe80::21f:d0ff:fea1:b79c mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff mflags 00003000 flags 00000001 addto_syslog: Listen normally on 7 lo ::1 UDP 123 restrict: op 1 addr ::1 mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff mflags 00003000 flags 00000001 restrict: op 1 addr 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 mflags 00000000 flags 00000090 restrict: op 1 addr :: mask 0.0.0.0 mflags 00000000 flags 00000090 restrict: op 1 addr 127.0.0.1 mask 255.255.255.255 mflags 00000000 flags 00000000 key_expire: at 0 associd 55448 peer_clear: at 0 next 1 associd 55448 refid INIT event at 0 10.101.10.20 8011 81 mobilize assoc 55448 newpeer: 192.168.2.20->10.101.10.20 mode 3 vers 4 poll 6 10 flags 0x101 0x1 ttl 0 key 00000000 event at 0 0.0.0.0 c016 06 restart event at 0 0.0.0.0 c012 02 freq_set ntpd 105.462 PPM transmit: at 1 192.168.2.20->10.101.10.20 mode 3 len 48 auth_agekeys: at 1 keys 1 expired 0 receive: at 1 192.168.2.20<-10.101.10.20 mode 4 len 48 event at 1 10.101.10.20 8024 84 reachable clock_filter: n 1 off 0.016817 del 0.000711 dsp 7.937504 jit 0.000000 transmit: at 3 192.168.2.20->10.101.10.20 mode 3 len 48 receive: at 3 192.168.2.20<-10.101.10.20 mode 4 len 48 clock_filter: n 2 off 0.016646 del 0.000439 dsp 3.937513 jit 0.000171 transmit: at 5 192.168.2.20->10.101.10.20 mode 3 len 48 receive: at 5 192.168.2.20<-10.101.10.20 mode 4 len 48 clock_filter: n 3 off 0.016624 del 0.000485 dsp 1.937522 jit 0.000137 transmit: at 7 192.168.2.20->10.101.10.20 mode 3 len 48 receive: at 7 192.168.2.20<-10.101.10.20 mode 4 len 48 clock_filter: n 4 off 0.016485 del 0.000336 dsp 0.937528 jit 0.000227 select: combine offset 0.016485415 jitter 0.000227401 event at 7 10.101.10.20 963a 8a sys_peer clock_update: at 7 sample 7 associd 55448 addto_syslog: ntpd: time slew +0.016485 s ntpd: time slew +0.016485s root@moose:/tmp/tiff_test(77)# echo $? 0 It looks OK for me. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-11T11:12:11+00:00 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: The same bug affects Fedora (see the upstream bug report that superceded 1716) and has now been fixed upstream. https://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1709 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-04-27T16:32:11+00:00 Jeremy Olexa wrote: To the best of my knowledge, this bug was fixed in 4.2.6_p3. I've opened a stablereq for that version in bug 365097 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-04-27T16:33:07+00:00 Jeremy Olexa wrote: Resolved, obsolete because net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p2 version isn't even in the tree. Feel free to re-open if I am incorrect. Thanks. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/comments/9 ** Changed in: ntp (Debian) Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: gentoo Status: Unknown => Expired ** Changed in: gentoo Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787551 Title: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: "no server suitable for synchronization found" - works with 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs