The page you referenced doesn't include anything that I can find about the ticket priority level. It states that "Stable release updates will, in general, only be issued in order to fix high-impact bugs" and provides several examples. Among them is "Bugs which do not fit under above categories, [security vulnerabilities, severe regressions, or loss of user data] but (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical infrastructure packages (like X.org or the kernel)."
I submit that this is an "obviously safe patch." The change is small, simple, isolated, has been tested to work, and doesn't change any interfaces. Is qemu-kvm considered a "critical infrastructure package" or not? I don't know the answer to that, but I can see valid arguments both for and against. I also have an example of a potential data loss situation, though it is admittedly somewhat weak. I'll spare everyone the narrative but I'll share it if it would be helpful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447 Title: virsh save is very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvirt/+bug/524447/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
