Excerpts from Bfreis's message of Mon Sep 26 19:55:40 UTC 2011: > Hello. > > I've just installed the update from natty-proposed on my 3 servers (2 > NCs, 1 CC), and they seem to be fine. I will confirm if everything is > still OK tomorrow, since the errors were intermittent. > > It is the first time I use "-proposed", so I have a question: if > everything goes smooth, and you publish this update to "main", will I > have to do anything on my servers, like reinstall the packages, or > somehow tell the system that the packages now come from "main" instead > of "-proposed"? Will I be able to simply remove the "deb ... natty- > proposed ..." line from /etc/apt/sources.list without destroying > anything? > > Thanks!
No, you won't have to do anything. Apt doesn't care where the latest package comes from on upgrade, it just gets the latest package*. * absent any apt-pinning or use of backports. ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854946 Title: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/854946/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
