On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM, James Dinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would read the documentation on another system then, assuming the
> system referred to is a production server and not a test server.  Even
> it there is a viable need for an interactive web browser, I think the
> use case would be so rare and added to the fact that people will have
> differing preferences on which text browser is best, that including
> any one in the default seed is a bad idea.

This sounds reasonable to me.  As mentioned above, I think it can be
handled in the Ubuntu Server Guide document with a list of viable text
browser alternatives and a pointer to the apt-get command.


:-Dustin

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Reply via email to