On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:40:26PM -0500, Michael Hipp wrote:
> I've read good things about VirtualBox so I'm hoping it will not have
> the many deficiencies of VMWare Server. (If there are other "free"
> server virtualization products worth trying, I'd like to hear of
> them.)

KVM is all the rage these days. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM

> But I don't want all that graphical X-Windows and Qt bloat 

Then VirtualBox is not for you. At least not the free version. It
doesn't have a headless mode. The non-free version... Well, we can't
really help you with that :)

-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Reply via email to