On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Your updated test case corrected the issue with images being registered >> as x86_64 when they should be i386: >> >> $ euca-describe-images >> IMAGE eki-414A16BA >> k-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml admin >> available public i386 kernel >> IMAGE eri-24D11642 >> r-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml admin >> available public i386 ramdisk >> IMAGE emi-23FE11BA i-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml >> admin available public i386 machine >> >> Thanks for updating the test case so quickly. >> >> I'm having an issue starting an instance, which is the last command in >> step 7. I still see the "disk not found" and "no domain with matching >> name found" errors, but I'm also seeing an error saying "no supported >> architecture for os type 'hvm'": >> >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] currently running/booting: >> i-39A80763 >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt: internal error >> no supported architecture for os type 'hvm' (code=1) >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAFATAL ] hypervisor failed to >> start domain >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt: Domain not >> found: no domain with matching name 'i-39A80763' (code=42) >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm -rf >> /var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin/i-39A80763/] >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:01 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] stopping the network (vlan=10) >> >> I'll investigate and test further. > > There might be a bug trying to run EMIs registered as i386 under > karmic/libvirt. A bug we wouldn't have hit before because: > > 1/ we always used euca-register without -r and that defaults to x86_64 > 2/ i386 images run fine in a x86_64 VM > > Maybe something related to bug 448671. > > -- > Thierry Carrez > Ubuntu server team >
Yes my issue does look very similar to bug 448671. I can either stay with this i386 install and help test for this bug. Or, I could install x86_64 and see if the issue goes away? Do you have any preference? Thanks, Joe -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
