On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 09:10 -0500, Douglas Stanley wrote: > I'm not at all interested in clustered filesystems. I'm only > interested in a clustered volume management > solution. > > I already know about clvm and it's need for redhat's suite...I'm just > wondering if there's an alternative. > I thought I read somewhere about EVMS supporting clustering natively. > But I know nothing about it, > so I don't know if it just uses CLVM underneath. > > Anyway, is there any alternative to CLVM + redhat cluster suite, or is > that the more or less standard way? > > Thanks, > Doug
Don't flame me please for talking about another Linux distro, but I've got it implemented using Pacemaker (www.clusterlabs.org) on SUSE. I have no idea if Pacemaker is in the latest Ubuntu server also - I've had it's predecessor Heartbeat running on 8.10 though. Fact is, to do cLVM, you do need a cluster solution. In my opinion, pacemaker is the more open solution. If you're interested, I can send you a short document that gives a generic overview of what you need - please let me know that by private mail if you'd like to have it. -Sander -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
