Hi Justin, On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:23:19PM -0400, justino garcia wrote: > Which is faster: iSCSI to linux box over 1Gb or local SATA storage with > intel ICH9?
You'll have to benchmark for your load, but local storage is usually faster than remote at least because of the lower latency. I would expect to be able to directly attach even a few normal 7.2kRPM SATA disks in RAID and beat iSCSI to a faster array on the same network, given the same load. Networked storage is not normally used vs. local disk for performance reasons, but for other reasons. > Does it also depend on nic card, and other factors? Yes. :) -- http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
