On 01/18/2011 10:20 AM, Monte Milanuk wrote: > I guess if someone was wanting to evaluate Ubuntu as an enterprise > choice vs. say RHEL, SuSE or other options, having a reasonably > up-to-date Server page with complete information would be something I > would expect. I was under the impression that was where Canonical was > wanting to go with their Server version? 'Community' or no, I am a bit > surprised the company doesn't keep up their website a little better. You > might go to packages.ubuntu.com; I might go to DistroWatch and compare > various distributions/releases, and someone else might have another > way. But neither excuses Canonical from keeping their .com site up to > date.
Right. That page is ubuntu.com/server not a community page. That enterprise version is the current LTS version which is 10.04. The "point" releases in between a LTS release are designed for development and test and not recommend for production in a enterprise environment. The canonical.com site is up to date wrt enterprise usage of ubuntu server and is maintained by canonical. ubuntu.com is the community site and has a open format for anyone to update/modify/change as necessary. It is policed as well as it can be, but is a VERY large site. You found some areas that need updating...your contributions are welcome and warranted. -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
