I updated the bug with the new intention

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:51 PM Rafael David Tinoco
<rafaeldtin...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> > The reporter is correct in that this comes up every now and then.
> > GlusterFS is very popular with samba clustering (CTDB) setups. Would
> > it be worth it to add a delta with debian and create a new binary
> > package for just the glusterfs vfs module and place that in universe?
> >
>
> I like the idea @ahasenack, if you have bandwidth for that... or at
> least to keep this in the backlog...
>
> In my previous discourse doc:
>
> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ctdb-create-a-3-node-nfs-ha-backed-by-a-clustered-filesystem/11608
>
> I even talked about CTDB + NFS HA and quoted GlusterFS as an example:
>
> """
> SUMMARY
>
> 2 x clustered filesystem servers (could be GlusterFS servers)
> 3 x nodes as clients to this Clustered Filesystem
> The 3 NFS nodes will act as clients to Clustered FS
> The 3 NFS nodes will act as servers for NFS service
> The NFS service will be High Available among all 3 nodes
> NFS clients can DNS load balance among the 3 x NFS servers
> If 1 NFS server goes down, the other NFS server will act on its behalf
> All NFS servers will serve the SAME FILESYSTEM
> CTDB lock file MUST reside in a clustered filesystem directory
> """
>
> Just checked and we're synced with Debian in 8.1-1 for GlusterFS.
>
> I'm +1 as I have always liked GlusterFS =).

-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Reply via email to