Eric Hedekar wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I was up late working on a poster and for the life of me couldn't find > the perfect font for the job. That's when I did an 'apt-cache search > font' and realized that there's a massive cornucopia of font packages > in the repositories awaiting my install. That's when I thought to > myself: "Self, why aren't these font packages part of the Ubuntu > Studio graphics meta package?" > > I think it would be organizationally best (if the list concurs that > fonts in the graphics package would be good) to have a font meta > package that is in turn a dependency of the graphics meta (simply > because the sheer number of font packages would clutter the graphics > package if added directly). The other question on my mind is "would > it be okay to include non-free fonts in this meta?" and for that I > turn the floor over to those more experienced...
I think this is a great idea actually. But, we should only ship free fonts. @Eric: Could you compile a list of font packages available in Main and Universe? -Cory K. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel