/me +1 kdenlive ... anyone else using anything that is relevant for video production?
relevant = legally viable, currently in the repos, On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:18 PM, <lukefro...@hushmail.com> wrote: > Kdenlive assuming no issue comes along to prevent it from building. It may > not > get new development for a while as the developer had to take a break and > next > up is a huge refactoring program, but at version 0.9.6 right now it > performs > very well and is regarded by many as simply the best video editor > available in > Linux. It is so important to my work that I could never use any version of > any > distro in which it could not either be installed or run from a portable > folder. > > Lightworks by comparison is NOT free software, it requires activation, the > unpaid > version is almost useless and no source code is available. In my opinion > no distro > should touch it. > > On 02/12/2014 at 9:28 AM, "Kaj Ailomaa" <zeque...@mousike.me> wrote: > > > >Opinions on what we should or should not include for Ubuntu Studio > >Trusty, and why? > > > >plugins, applications, tools, fonts, etc, etc... > > > >-- > >ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list > >ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > >Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > > > -- > ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list > ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel > -- MH mikeholstein.info <http://www.mikeholstein.info/>
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
