On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 07:23 PM, Len Ovens wrote: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called > > multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove. > > > > That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it? > > Is there a utility like dssi-host-jack for ladspa plugins to replace it? > There are some plugin authors (some of the best I might add) that will > only ever produce their plugins as ladspa and are not interested in > making > LV2 versions. I think sox can do this... but anything with sox is not for > newbys... ECAsound could do this too, but we don't include it as we are > doing GUI stuff so no Nama DAW. > > jack-rack is the only application for putting to together a standalone > set > of Ladspa plugins... but the fact that it is not maintained says > something. Almost anyone who uses plugins uses them inside something else > anyway. >
As long as it is functional, it seems there is some reason to keep it. But, I can't try it until Monday, the earliest. If we keep it, we become maintainers and it will only exist in Ubuntu. That leaves us more time to figure out another solution. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
