fredagen den 29:e juli 2016 kl. 17:52:35 CEST, Kaj Ailomaa
<zeque...@mousike.me> skrev:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, at 02:33 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote:
On 2016-06-23 02:00, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
> Seventh try ;) Hi here is only a base I will ad to it some more but
> what do you think about this?
> http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0
I made a few shots that could work well as complementary pictures to the
more abstracto-figurative pictures Geirdal made for the categories.
I realize they might not be perfect, but maybe you like the idea?
I tried to make one for each category, but i think they all end up
having a lot of "audio focus" maybe it is a good thing? You tell me. One
sure thing is that the "graphic workflow" one, needs a different
on-screen content :D (too "cute, wtf, kindergarten")
http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__1.jpg
http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__2.jpg
http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/featuretour__3.jpg
The more i look at Geirdal pictures, the better i like these:
http://geirdal.is/images/studio/audio_x.png
http://geirdal.is/images/studio/graphic_03.png
http://geirdal.is/images/studio/video_x.png
If they are used without the pictograms, like they were intended: as
backgrounds for text and screenshots, i think they are perfect! They
refer to analogue times with very contemporary elements. I think it
emulates what we are quite well: /linux for creative humans/ a digital
product made by analogue robots ;) And they are quiet and noisy at the
same time, which i find to be a really poetic contrast.
I think this one is really beautyfull but it should be used without the
logos for the general "about" text in the feature tour (:
http://geirdal.is/images/studio/studio_07.png
It is risky, but i also find it very cool, fresh and inspiring. 90's
fractal with a millennial twist! This afternoon i will try put together
what i mean in a collage.
I'm convinced that, properly framed on the page, using geirdals pictures
could make the sexiest feature tour, ever :)
Yours,
--
Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer
The only thing I would like to remind of is of the "big picgture", which
should be about information. It's easy to become a bit obsessed about
the details of a design, but the importance is still around what the
whole thing informs.
And, what is the information? That is the question that needs to be
answered - not only with graphics, but with the whole thing.
The current feature tour is old, and should be buried. It should be
replaced by something that does the same thing, but better. Better
information. Better graphics, but most importantly - better information.
Thank you, Kaj!
I tried to base the text
( http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/feature-tour.txt )
and layout as good as i could on your and autumna's wiki page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/FeatureDefinitions/WebsiteXenial
The text (and me) is begging for review and i'd love to read/see what you
all think should be corrected both text- and design-wise. I believe it's
the typical kindof work that gets super strong from teamwork. After all,
speaking to all, takes many. :)
Yours,
--
Set Hallström
Sent from my Ubuntu pocket computer
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
