Sorry, I didn't know that Rosegarden did real audio and not just MIDI. I see that it does after looking... :-( And I feel a bit stupid for saying that...
But really, you're not supposed to actually use that, are you???!!!! It's almost a joke, IMO. I guess I should be more careful what I say... :-) On Jan 4, 2008 9:46 PM, D. Michael McIntyre < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008, Christopher Stamper wrote: > > > Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT audio. So it won't help at all. > > (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not audio). > > I'm not sure what to make of this. Are you saying that Rosegarden can't > record audio, or that its audio facilities are so horrible that it's not > possible to conceive of using them for something? > > Ardour wins for features, sure, because it only does the one job. > However, if > the field of consideration includes something like Audacity... Are you > nuts? > Come on man, I'm fine with everyone preferring Ardour for audio recording, > but you seem to be implying that Rosegarden is less useful for recording > and > mixing a one man band than Audacity, and that's simply ludicrous. > -- > D. Michael McIntyre > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > -- Christopher Stamper [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users