Karoliina Salminen wrote: >> For TV/Movies, you cannot beat the tv output quality from a matrox card, >> although their output support is s-video/composite. >> > > I would like to have this clarified: You mean obviously with TV-output > here analog tube-TV? > Rather than today's flat panels which have HDMI and which get 100% perfect > output from nVidia? >
Yes I am referring to analog. As far as HDMI goes, HDMI 1.2 compared to component is no good. Do an a/b comaprison and you will see. HDMI1.3 vs component is almost equal. Haig > We have nVidia in our home theater PC (which is running Ubuntu) and it > is connected with HDMI to the HD-video projector. > Another video source is Playstation 3, which surprise surprise, > outputs its picture digitally through HDMI. > The picture is perfect obviously because it is digital and every pixel > gets displayed as it should (from both the computer and PS3). > > Is someone still using displays without HDMI these days? If I go to a > shop and look around TV-models, I can hardly find > any model which would not have HDMI. So at least in my vocabuary at > least, TV output = DVI = HDMI. And Matrox has > no use for this purpose. Who wants to use component video these days. > It hurts my eyes if I look picture from my > old DVD-player with component video. > > Best Regards, > Karoliina > > -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
