> >Original Message: >----------------- >From: Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com >Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:29:44 -0500 >To: sue...@empire.net, ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com >Subject: Backporting Jack > > >sue...@empire.net wrote: >> I'm curious as to why Jack won't be backported? > >Because it requires backporting other libs that effect other apps. One's >that we aren't gonna be responsible for at this time. Things may change, >but for now, we won't be backporting JACK. > > >-Cory K.
That's understandable. The reason I was attempting to compile Jack 116 was to get the alsa_in and alsa_out. But, I ended up with more questions than answers: - the resulting build did not create executables for them. Even though the source is in the tools folder under the extracted tar ball. - I mentioned the quest for alsa_in/out in another forum and others thought these had been there for some time (years) i.e they should be there in Jack 109. - I've found no googled info about compiling them separately. At this point, since Jack was stable before the build, I'm probably going to install Ubuntu Studio from scratch and hopefully get back to where I was. Mac -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft® Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
