Ralf, 2010/9/30 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net>: [...] > That's bad reasoning. Just because an app isn't ok, when using a > kernel-rt, low latency without rt isn't the better solution. > Independently, did you ensure that the kernel-rt runs with CPU frequency > scaling set up to performance? And did you test what will happen, if you > don't use rakarrack, but a heavy audio and MIDI set up? Did you compare > JACK1 and JACK2? Etc.? > Especially for external MIDI devices the so called Linux rt is far away > from hard rt. > Resume, even when using a kernel-rt, Linux is far away from hard rt, we > do need support of the kernel-rt for multimedia work and all the apps, > that do cause issues, when using a kernel-rt, need rework.
Sorry but my understanding of English is very limited. Could you explain your thoughts in a more simple manner? Thanks. Ciao, Alessio -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
